Timeline for Referring to permissioned account within contract code?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2019 at 3:22 | comment | added | Reason Lee | I now still have the same thoughts as you do on the sender question, so I just paste the link. I also check the system contract and see they usually pass the sender in. | |
| Jan 18, 2019 at 2:51 | vote | accept | ekkis | ||
| Jan 18, 2019 at 2:51 | comment | added | ekkis | and thanks for the clarification with respect to "payer" | |
| Jan 18, 2019 at 2:49 | comment | added | ekkis | so I guess the answer is no, it can't be done, though the statement "As actions can be called with several user permissions at the same time there is no unique caller." doesn't make much sense. if an action can be called with several user permissions (what for?) then an array of those permissions could be made available to the developer. this is important information without which developers are forced to pass in parameters that are redundant and could be erroneous | |
| Jan 18, 2019 at 2:23 | history | edited | Reason Lee | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 376 characters in body
|
| Jan 18, 2019 at 2:13 | history | answered | Reason Lee | CC BY-SA 4.0 |