Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with cpu
Search options not deleted
user 2486
Questions about EOSIO CPU concept, which is used to account for computational time required for processing transactions. Questions may relate to CPU allocation, usage reset, costs, optimisation, limitations, and others.
2
votes
1
answer
121
views
Does print() cost CPU cycles?
Does eosio::print cost CPU cycles to execute on the BPs?
On my node I have an option to print. … Assuming it is disabled for the BPs (print defined to return; or similar), does evaluating the arguments cost CPU cycles, e.g.
print("Hi", expensiveFunction()); …
- 267
2
votes
Accepted
Does print() cost CPU cycles?
print() appears to cost CPU cycles and expensiveFunction() is evaluated.
I tried with the following. …
- 267
1
vote
2
answers
174
views
Restricting runtime of a loop (Transaction took too long)
Can I obtain the max time I have remaining according to my staked CPU in my contract?
The avg. runtime per iteration depends on the BP hardware. … In the end I want to stop after n iterations with n = 0.9 x available CPU time / avg iteration time (0.9 is some safety margin). …
- 267